Rethinking Peace and Justice

This IFIT essay aims to provoke an overdue discussion in the mediation and human rights fields on the benefits of adopting a less ideological approach to balancing peace and justice.

The publication demonstrates that flexible approaches to justice, particularly as part of negotiated transitions out of armed conflict, have received increased recognition in international law and policy in recent years. Drawing on state practice and policy, the publication explains how carefully designed legal leniency measures can play an important role in helping societies to move beyond violent pasts; and how negotiation techniques and process design can take advantage of the flexibility international law allows in order to balance peace and justice.

The ideas expressed in this publication are informed by the experience of the members of IFIT’s Law and Peace Practice Group, who have had direct involvement in the negotiation of amnesty and accountability issues in over 20 countries.

The DOI registration ID for this publication is: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3842933

You may also be interested in

Public Commentary / 11 November 2020

Building the International Law of Peace

By Mark Freeman / IFIT Executive Director

publication / Law and Peace

Negotiating with Criminal Groups: IFIT Guidance Note for Good-Faith Promoters

publication / Law and Peace

Partial Agreements: The Functional Alternative to All-Encompassing Settlements

publication / Law and Peace

The Scope for Dialogue with Security Forces in Hybrid Regimes

Available in:

• Español

publication / Law and Peace

Effective Participation in Political and Peace Negotiations

Available in:

• Español